Posts Tagged George W. Bush

The Presidential Halo Effect

He is often labeled “The Most Powerful Man on Earth.”  He is also the recipient of a Nobel Peace Prize.  Excuse my logic, but seriously folks, are we going to label him Saint Obama?

If the photos tell the story maybe he’s already been canonized.

What I am getting at are photos that anyone who likes to Google can find that show some of our recent presidents with what appear to be halos above their heads.

Upon close inspection the viewer will quickly realize that the “halo” is nothing more than the blurred image of the presidential seal that is hung behind the president’s podium whenever he addresses the media or other official gatherings.

Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and now President Obama have all been immortalized with halo photos as shown below.

Now I am really impartial as far as President Obama is concerned.  I am not his biggest fan but then again I am not a detractor. So when I first saw a halo photo last year the skeptical journalistic side of me was fuming that certain liberal members of the media had deliberately shot the photo that way to imbue Obama with divine persona.

Upon calming down over this phenomenon, I started Googling and soon saw that the other aforementioned presidents had also been adorned with halos in their photos.

Once I had the chance to think the whole thing over I must confess that I think the entire staging of these photos may have some positive sides.

We live in what is still the greatest most successful country on Earth. Serving as the president of this great nation is not an easy task.  No matter what he does, there will always be some special interest group, lobbyist group or other naysayers that call him out.

When a new president is elected he rides into Washington on the wave of being picked the most popular politician in the country.  People have high hopes.  So is it surprising or even inaccurate to picture him with a halo?  After all, albeit temporarily, the new president is often regarded as a sort of messiah who will safeguard our freedoms and deliver us to a life of prosperity and security.  Of course, things don’t always turn out that way.

As well with regard to the halo, serving as president despite all the security protection he receives is a dangerous job.  Two sitting presidents have been assassinated and countless other presidents have been the target of thwarted attempts on their lives.

Thus, the office of the president is in my opinion sacrosanct.  To those who diss our country, be they Americans or others, I ask you to consider what other nation on earth has so welcomed immigrants from every walk of life and from every country the world over.  Furthermore, look at countries such as North Korea, Iran, and now in particular Syria.  Their records on human rights are atrocious.  We in America like to complain when one of our civil rights is trampled on.  Yet unlike Syria and other countries our president doesn’t employ secret hit squads to mow down anyone who opposes him.  Here we are free to speak our mind and assemble peacefully to protest that which we don’t like about our government.

In recent years our past presidents and current one, have never been caught being drunk or impaired while on the job. Each of them has had to live in the huge fishbowl existence that the modern day media has created and have all behaved admirably well with grace under pressure.

In short, while someone reading this may not think that our current president or any specific past presidents are holy figures, the office of the President itself is a sacred spot.

Pictured below are some of our presidents wearing halos.  If you want to have a little fun, picture what some of the distant past presidents would have looked like wearing one. In particular, I think Martin Van Buren would have looked hideous with one.

Here’s to the presidency and God Bless America.

Copyright 2012; Greg S.

Advertisements

, , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

What are You Doing on Earth Day?

Excuse my logic, and also excuse my cliché, but in honor of Earth Day this Friday, April 22,  I’ll ask the question that’s been asked time and time again – “Shouldn’t every day be Earth Day?”  I get very emotional when thinking about our planet because it pains me to see how we have scorched, poisoned, polluted and in general been very poor stewards of  this precious gift that was given us by God, the Creator or whatever higher power you choose to call him. 

My wife on several occasions has put it quite succinctly to me. “The Earth is sick,” she says.  I tip my hat to her for I couldn’t have said it better myself. I also tip my hat to Al Gore for his film “An Inconvenient Truth.”  He is a visionary and more.  After conceding the highly debatable 2000 presidential election to George W. Bush, he could have just sat home and felt sorry for himself, but he went out and became an admirable and indefatigable crusader for protecting our environment.

Some of the occurrences that seem to be happening with more and more frequency should act as wakeup calls to everyone.  I don’t care if you are young or old, single or raising a family, rich or poor, famous or anonymous, legal or the worst terrorist on Earth.  We all have to live here and it’s time we take notice.  Two devastating tsunamis occurred in a five year period.  In this country, we suffered the devastation of Hurricane Katrina.  Then there was the Gulf Oil Spill, ironically the anniversary of which is just two days before Earth Day.  We hear reports of chunks of ice the size of  Delaware or Rhode Island breaking off the polar ice caps.  As Al Gore’s film pointed out, a large lake in Africa just drying up. Increasing amounts of acid rain falling.  The list goes on and on.   

We have polluted the ground, the water and the air.  What’s more, we have annihilated the tropical rain forests, a priceless treasure trove of some two thirds of all the living species on the planet.  We need the rainforests as they are the single greatest terrestrial source of air that we breathe according to the website: savetherainforest.org.  This website presents some sobering facts.  I vaguely remember about ten years ago visiting an exhibit called the Biodome inMontreal,Canada.  There was a sign that indicated back then there were about two billion acres of rainforest worldwide and at the rate of destruction occurring back then that number would be halved in twenty years time.  The savetherainforest.org website confirms this foggy memory of mine. They say that by the year 2025 half of our original amount of rainforests will be gone and by the year 2060 if our destructive ways continue, there will be no rainforest at all!

Any parent, grandparent, uncle or aunt should pause and give thought on this incredible projection.  It has implications for all of us. 

I have noticed that more and more the rate of birth defects in newborns has been on the rise. People are getting cancer at younger ages than ever and at an alarming incidence. Is it any wonder, with all the garbage we dump into landfills, thus polluting the land and the surrounding ground water?  It’s not just big business to blame. Every time we throw out a kitchen appliance or television instead of recycling it, we become accomplices to the crime. 

On an individual level, we can heed that slogan, “Reduce, Recycle, Reuse.” Changing your oil?  Don’t throw the filter in the garbage. Bring it to your local recycling center.  Thinking of throwing that aluminum can out your car window while sitting at a red light? Again, recycle.  Thinking of doing a spring cleaning and considering throwing all your unwanted junk in the next day’s garbage?  Hold a garage sale instead.  One man’s junk is another’s treasure. Or just rearrange your basement to accommodate the unwanted junk until it can be picked up by the Salvation Army or some other charitable organization.  Give the Earth a break.

That’s just a sampling of recommendations for individual people but what about the society as a whole?

I certainly don’t pretend to have all the answers nor do I think anyone does.  However, a couple of suggestions come to mind.  I remember hearing years ago about one man who spearheaded a campaign to clean up a local river in his state, I believe somewhere in theMidwest.  He successfully restored what had become a cesspool into a river that could be swam in and enjoyed by the people there.  His monetary reward from the government was a paltry $60,000.  Now that might seem like a lot of money to some of my readers but I offer this proposition.  Why don’t we make it more lucrative for developers and construction people worldwide to devote their energies to cleaning up waterways and land masses as opposed to building more and more skyscrapers, which are themselves sources of pollution, not to mention death traps in the event of a major earthquake?  Where’s the incentive for people in real estate development to focus their efforts on cleaning up the environment when they can make hundreds and even thousands of times more money building tall buildings?

My other suggestion concerns the automobile industry, both in this country and abroad. Isn’t it time we rid ourselves of the albatross known as dependence upon Middle Eastern and South American oil?  In the United States alone, many people believe that the several trillion dollars we’ve spent on making war inIraq is all about seizing control of that country’s oil.  For a fraction of that money spent, say $1 trillion, we could disseminate about 40 million electric cars to our people, thereby greatly reducing our contribution to the global warming problem. If we did it in this country, many other countries worldwide, though reluctant to admit they like to emulate us, would soon fall into line and mass produce such vehicles also.  Furthermore, this is not to mention the other option of mass producing solar powered cars.

I recall hearing one talk show in which in an environmental scientist indicated we are now at a critical crossroads in the amount of carbon dioxide or what’s called greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.  If within the next ten to twenty years, we don’t severely reduce the amount of CO2 from current rates of approximately 385 parts per million (ppm) to a rate of 350 ppm but instead allow this concentration to increase even higher than 385 ppm, we will experience irreversible climate catastrophe and reach a so called point of no return.

I offer some anecdotes to conclude this piece.  Years ago, mind you in the late 1970s which is an eternity ago, I stopped at a toll booth at exit 13A of the New Jersey Turnpike. The toll collector there was wearing – get this – a gas mask.  I jokingly asked him if he was expecting some kind of chemical warfare attack. He pointed at the smokestacks not far away which were emitting some kind of chemicals into the air with a deafening noise. “That’s why,” he said.

Then another time also in the 1970s, also in the NJ Turnpike corridor, I ventured onto the grounds of some kind of generating plant with thousands of lights and dozens of smoke emitting pips and began snapping pictures. A guard quickly approached me and asked me what I was doing.  Then it became obvious to him.  Quite defensively he commented that the smoke billowing from the various pipes was steam.  Then he ordered me to leave at once.  If it were in fact steam, I always wondered since that night, why was he so frightened of me taking photos?

The Earth is sick.  Maybe it’s time for all of us to take up biking.

Copyright 2011; Greg S.  

, , , , , , ,

1 Comment